Luo said: "This 53 reefs from the historical point of view are China, the ownership of the reefs are clearly defined in international law, there are four elements, the first is, who first discovered, who first named the second , who is the first third of its administrative jurisdiction, the fourth is whether the international community to be recognized, while four areas in which China has sufficient historical and legal basis for the international community on China's sovereignty and jurisdiction over the South China Sea is not dissenting. especially now that the dispute is the largest in Vietnam, Vietnam in 1960 and 1972 published the "World map" plan regarded the South China Sea within the Chinese territory. prior to 1975, the Vietnamese are explicitly recognized China's Nansha Islands territorial sovereignty of the Philippines and Malaysia (the last century), 70 years ago and no legal documents and leaders of the speech refers to its own territory, including the Nansha Islands in this issue, from the continuation of history, China no matter from history and legal basis has sufficient evidence to prove that the South China Sea, China's Nansha Islands. "
The undisputed why the formation of China's territorial sovereignty dispute complicated situation? All due to the economic interests driving. South China Sea not only has an extraordinarily rich fishery resources, deep-sea flora and fauna, more importantly, the South China Sea bears a stunning undersea oil and gas resources. The mid-1970s, the United Nations Energy Development Department, the preliminary estimate of the South China Sea oil reserves at 230 billion -300 billion tons, is the world's four major offshore oil and gas gathering, known as the "second Persian Gulf." In recent years, Vietnam, the Philippines and other countries have a lot of exploitation of the South China Sea oil and gas resources. To Vietnam, for example, mining 30 million tons annually from the Nansha oil and gas, of which 800 tons is to grab from the disputed area.
没有评论:
发表评论